Appellate Court Finds Liquidated-damages Clause Was Not a Penalty and Thus Was Enforceable

Mineo v. Lakeside Village of Davie, LLC, 983 So.  2d 20 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Where a contract for the purchase of real property and construction of a residence gave the seller the option of retaining deposits and change order payments as liquidated damages in the event of the buyer’s default, or the seller could sue for specific performance at the purchase price plus interest as delay damages, the liquidated damages provision was not an unenforceable penalty because the contract did not provide the seller with the option to sue for actual damages (which would have change the character of the forfeiture as agreed damages).

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.klconstructionlawblog.com/admin/trackback/171400
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.