“Completed and Accepted” Rule Does Not Excuse Architect, General Contractor and Heating Contractor from Liability
Totten v. Gruzen, 245 A.2d 1, 52 N.J. 202 (1968)
In this case, the Supreme Court of New Jersey held that the “completed and accepted” rule does not render defendants immune from liability for injuries sustained from a faulty heating system. A child resident of a multi-family housing project sustained serious burns from contact with exposed, hot piping that was part of the radiator heating system in the child’s bedroom. The court found that the lack of privity between the plaintiffs and the defendants was insufficient to excuse the defendants from liability.